🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a new game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but includes a few notable changes:

• Each team has just eight human participants, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions performed by real players award full XP, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, as it gives more options for gamers looking for different ways to have fun with the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of BF6 players are mad.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer real players. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," and another lists all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this game all the time. Let them strike a balance," states another. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Feedback

All that said, there are constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. A few folks have highlighted that it will make queue times more extended for different playlists because of the large amount of options currently available. On a similar note, certain regions already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the player base compromising halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this mode as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data shows this new playlist isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.